2026 Global Employer of Record Pricing Index
- Last Updated: January 19, 2026
Co-founder
Co-founder & Editor
Report Index
Executive Summary
The Global Employer of Record Pricing Index clarifies how EOR costs vary across regions and countries, and the structural factors that drive those differences.
As global hiring expands, companies are often faced with fragmented or inconsistent information on EOR pricing, making early-stage budgeting and comparison difficult. This index provides a structured, cross-country view of EOR pricing dynamics to support those decisions.
This is not a pricing table or a quote engine. EOR costs are shaped by local labor laws, statutory benefits, tax structures, currency exposure, and employment risk. Because these factors vary widely by jurisdiction, pricing cannot be meaningfully represented as a single global average or a fixed country-level figure.
Instead, the index uses pricing bands, regional patterns, and cost drivers to reflect how EOR services are typically priced in practice.
The index is intended for finance leaders modeling international expansion, HR teams assessing new hiring markets, and operators evaluating the feasibility of distributed teams. It does not rank or promote EOR providers, nor does it replace provider-specific proposals or contracts.
All figures are directional. They reflect observed market ranges rather than list prices and assume standard full-time employment scenarios. Variations driven by seniority, industry, equity compensation, or non-standard benefits are noted where relevant.
By combining global, regional, and country-level perspectives within a single framework, the index functions as a reference layer that supports deeper country guides and cost calculators without substituting for them.
What the Index Measures: EOR Cost Components and Pricing Drivers
Core Cost Components Included
The cost of maintaining a compliant local entity, acting as the legal employer, and assuming statutory employer liability.
Ongoing payroll administration, tax withholding, social security contributions, and required filings with local authorities.
Contract issuance, onboarding, offboarding, leave management, and compliance documentation.
Handling mandatory benefits such as pensions, insurance schemes, paid leave, and government-mandated allowances.
Ongoing updates to employment law changes, audit readiness, and mitigation of misclassification or co-employment risk.
Primary Drivers of Pricing Variation
Jurisdictions with rigid termination rules, collective bargaining coverage, or detailed employment codes tend to carry higher EOR fees.
Countries with extensive mandatory benefits or multi-layered social security systems increase administrative and financial burden.
Markets with active labor inspections or material penalties for non-compliance price risk more aggressively.
Volatile currencies, capital controls, or restricted cross-border payments can increase operational cost and pricing buffers.
In regions where EOR is well established, pricing bands are often tighter; in emerging markets, ranges are wider due to inconsistent delivery models.
Global EOR Pricing Overview by Region
High-cost regions
North America, Western Europe
Drivers: compliance, benefits, termination risk
Mid-cost regions
LATAM, East Asia, Middle East
Drivers: payroll complexity, visa models
Lower-cost regions
South Asia, Eastern Europe
Drivers: standardized payroll, lower ops cost
North America
Typical EOR fee range: High
Typical range: USD 400–1,000+
Generally, at the upper end of global pricing bands.
Primary pricing drivers:
Complex employment liability frameworks, healthcare-related benefit administration, and higher baseline operating costs contribute to elevated pricing. In the United States in particular, multi-state compliance and termination risk are key cost drivers.
Common surprises:
Healthcare administration, workers’ compensation exposure, and state-level employment variation often add complexity beyond initial estimates.
Western Europe
Typical EOR fee range: Medium to high
Typical range: USD 450–1,200
Often comparable to or slightly below North America, depending on country.
Primary pricing drivers:
Strong worker protections, extensive statutory benefits, and formal termination processes increase administrative effort. Collective bargaining agreements in some countries add further complexity.
Common surprises:
Notice periods, mandatory bonuses, and employer-funded social contributions are frequently underestimated during budgeting.
Eastern Europe
Typical EOR fee range: Low to medium
Typical range: USD 300–600
Generally lower than Western Europe, with narrower bands in mature markets.
Primary pricing drivers:
Simpler benefit structures and lower operating costs reduce fees, although EU compliance standards still apply in many countries.
Common surprises:
Language requirements, local contract formalities, and evolving labor regulations can affect timelines and pricing stability.
Latin America (LATAM)
Typical EOR fee range: Medium
Typical range: USD 250–900
Ranges tend to be wider than in Europe due to variability by country.
Primary pricing drivers:
High statutory employer contributions, complex payroll calculations, and formal termination rules influence pricing.
Common surprises:
Severance obligations, mandatory bonuses, and frequent regulatory changes often increase total employment complexity.
Middle East
Typical EOR fee range: Medium to high
Typical range: USD 400–900
Varies significantly between Gulf states and other markets.
Primary pricing drivers:
Sponsorship requirements, immigration-linked employment models, and local ownership rules affect cost structures.
Common surprises:
Visa dependencies, end-of-service gratuities, and restrictions on contract flexibility are common planning gaps.
South Asia
Typical EOR fee range: Low
Typical range: USD 200–650
Among the lowest global pricing bands.
Primary pricing drivers:
Lower operating costs and standardized payroll structures keep fees relatively contained.
Common surprises:
State-level labor variations, compliance documentation requirements, and benefit administration complexity at scale.
Southeast Asia
Typical EOR fee range: Low to medium
Typical range: USD 300–900
Moderate pricing with country-level variation.
Primary pricing drivers:
Differences in labor regulation maturity, benefit systems, and enforcement consistency across the region.
Common surprises:
Mandatory social contributions and localized employment practices can vary more than expected between neighboring countries.
East Asia
Typical EOR fee range: Medium to high
Typical range: USD 450–1,000+
Pricing tends to be higher in developed markets.
Primary pricing drivers:
Strict labor protections, formal termination processes, and detailed payroll compliance requirements.
Common surprises:
Notice period enforcement, seniority-based obligations, and administrative documentation requirements.
Africa
Typical EOR fee range: Low to medium
Typical range: USD 250–700
Wide ranges depending on country and infrastructure maturity.
Primary pricing drivers:
Operational complexity, compliance uncertainty, and limited payroll infrastructure in some markets.
Common surprises:
Currency controls, inconsistent regulatory enforcement, and banking limitations often affect pricing stability.
Country-Level EOR Pricing Benchmarks
Pricing bands reflect typical exposure to upper-range EOR fees rather than minimum advertised prices.
Higher pricing reflects elevated employment risk, healthcare administration, and regulatory complexity.
United States
Salary band: USD 70,000–120,000
EOR fee range: USD 800–1,200
Drivers: Employment liability, healthcare administration, multi-state compliance
Compliance: Termination risk and state-level variation materially affect cost
Germany
Salary band: EUR 60,000–100,000
EOR fee range: USD 700–1,000
Drivers: Strong worker protections, termination rules, statutory benefits
Compliance: Works councils and notice periods increase complexity
France
Salary band: EUR 55,000–90,000
EOR fee range: USD 700–1,000
Drivers: Extensive statutory benefits and payroll structure
Compliance: Termination procedures are formal and tightly regulated
United Kingdom
Salary band: GBP 45,000–80,000
EOR fee range: USD 600–900
Drivers: Employment protections, payroll compliance, pensions
Compliance: Notice periods and pension obligations impact cost
Canada
Salary band: CAD 70,000–110,000
EOR fee range: USD 600–1,000
Drivers: Provincial labor laws, statutory benefits, payroll administration
Compliance: Notice periods vary by province
United Arab Emirates
Salary band: USD 60,000–110,000
EOR fee range: USD 500–900
Drivers: Sponsorship model, visa linkage, local employment rules
Compliance: End-of-service gratuity planning is essential
Pricing reflects meaningful compliance and payroll complexity without the same level of cost inflation or risk exposure seen in high-band markets.
Netherlands
Salary band: EUR 60,000–95,000
EOR fee range: USD 650–900
Drivers: Benefits administration, notice periods
Compliance: Contract structuring affects termination exposure
Brazil
Salary band: USD 40,000–80,000
EOR fee range: USD 600–900
Drivers: Payroll complexity, high statutory contributions
Compliance: Mandatory bonuses and severance materially affect cost
Spain
Salary band: EUR 45,000–75,000
EOR fee range: USD 600–900
Drivers: Social security contributions, termination rules
Compliance: Severance exposure is often underestimated
Mexico
Salary band: USD 35,000–70,000
EOR fee range: USD 450–700
Drivers: Social security, payroll reporting
Compliance: Mandatory profit-sharing obligations
Singapore
Salary band: SGD 70,000–120,000
EOR fee range: USD 400–700
Drivers: Compliance rigor, benefits administration
Compliance: Termination documentation is closely enforced
Colombia
Salary band: USD 35,000–65,000
EOR fee range: USD 450–700
Drivers: Payroll compliance, statutory benefits
Compliance: Overtime and severance rules add variability
Lower pricing is driven by reduced operating costs and simpler delivery, though local compliance and execution risk may still be significant.
India
Salary band: USD 20,000–45,000
EOR fee range: USD 200–400
Drivers: Scale efficiencies, standardized payroll
Compliance: State-level labor laws increase complexity
South Africa
Salary band: USD 35,000–70,000
EOR fee range: USD 400–650
Drivers: Employment protections, payroll administration
Compliance: Termination procedures are regulated and time-bound
Poland
Salary band: EUR 35,000–65,000
EOR fee range: USD 350–600
Drivers: EU compliance with lower operating costs
Compliance: Contract type selection affects tax and benefits
Chile
Salary band: USD 40,000–75,000
EOR fee range: USD 450–700
Drivers: Compliance structure, benefits handling
Compliance: Termination rules require careful execution
Nigeria
Salary band: USD 25,000–50,000
EOR fee range: USD 300–600
Drivers: Infrastructure variability, compliance execution
Compliance: Enforcement consistency varies by region
Kenya
Salary band: USD 25,000–45,000
EOR fee range: USD 300–550
Drivers: Payroll operations, statutory benefits
Compliance: Notice and severance affect exit costs
EOR Pricing Models Guide
EOR pricing models affect how costs scale, but they do not change the underlying country-level employment risk that ultimately drives fees.
Flat Monthly Fee Models
Under a flat fee model, the EOR charges a fixed monthly amount per employee, regardless of salary. This approach is most common in markets where payroll, benefits, and compliance costs are relatively predictable.
Flat fees are easier to budget and compare across countries, which is why many buyers prefer them during early expansion planning. However, the “flat” nature often assumes standard roles and benefit configurations. Higher-risk terminations, senior roles, or non-standard benefits may still trigger adjustments.
Flat fee models are more common in mature EOR markets and in countries with stable regulatory environments.
Percentage-of-Salary Models
In a percentage-based model, the EOR fee is calculated as a percentage of the employee’s gross salary. This structure is more frequently used in countries where payroll administration scales with compensation or where statutory contributions are complex.
While this model aligns fees with compensation levels, it can obscure true service costs and make cross-country comparisons harder. Two employees in different countries with the same salary may generate very different administrative burdens, even though the percentage applied appears identical.
Percentage models tend to produce wider effective pricing ranges, particularly for higher-paid roles.
A percentage-based fee does not imply proportional service effort. Two countries with the same salary can carry very different compliance and termination risk.
Hybrid and Blended Pricing Structures
Many EOR providers use hybrid models that combine a base flat fee with variable components. These may include add-ons for benefits administration, compliance monitoring, or local reporting requirements.
Hybrid pricing is often used to balance predictability with risk management. It allows providers to price standard employment scenarios competitively while retaining flexibility for complex cases.
From a buyer’s perspective, hybrid models require closer scrutiny of what is included in the base fee versus treated as variable.
Why the Same Vendor Prices Differently by Country
Even when working with a single global provider, EOR pricing can vary substantially by country. This is driven by differences in local labor laws, termination risk, benefit structures, regulatory enforcement, and operational overhead.
In practice, EOR pricing reflects country-specific employment risk, not just service delivery effort. As a result, a lower-cost country does not necessarily imply simpler compliance, and a higher-cost country does not always indicate broader service scope.
These structural differences explain why global pricing comparisons must be interpreted within regional and country-level context rather than as direct equivalents.
In practice, EOR pricing reflects country-specific employment risk more than uniform service scope.
Methodology & Data Sources
How pricing ranges were derived, what is included, and how to interpret the data
This index is based on observed market behavior rather than vendor list prices or promotional claims. Its purpose is to reflect how Employer of Record services are typically priced in real hiring scenarios, while avoiding artificial precision.
Pricing ranges are derived from a combination of publicly available pricing disclosures, documented pricing examples, and aggregated observations from live EOR implementations across regions. Public sources are used to establish baseline expectations, while implementation data is used to validate where pricing most commonly settles in practice. Country-level regulatory analysis is applied to interpret why pricing varies and to distinguish service fees from statutory employment costs.
Important: The figures in this index reflect observed pricing behavior, not minimum advertised fees or individually negotiated outliers.
To ensure comparability across countries, the index applies consistent assumptions. All scenarios assume full-time employment via an EOR for non-executive professional roles. Pricing is expressed as a monthly EOR service fee per employee and normalized to USD equivalents for cross-country comparison. Salary, employer payroll taxes, immigration services, equity administration, and non-mandatory benefits are excluded by design. One-time setup or exit fees are not included unless they are structurally unavoidable in a given market.
Countries are grouped into pricing bands based on where EOR fees most frequently land rather than on extreme minimums or maximums. Band placement reflects typical pricing concentration, the frequency with which upper-bound pricing appears in standard engagements, and consistency across vendors. This approach allows for overlap at the edges while preserving meaningful differentiation between markets.
Interpretation note: Placement in a higher price band indicates greater exposure to upper-range EOR fees, not broader service scope or higher total employment cost.
The index is reviewed on a bi-annual basis, with interim updates made when material regulatory or market changes occur. Updates may be triggered by significant labor law reforms, structural changes to statutory benefits, or sustained shifts in observed pricing behavior. Each revision incorporates new data while maintaining methodological consistency to preserve trend comparability over time.
Limitations & Caveats
This index is intended as a directional pricing reference, not a substitute for provider-specific quotes or legal advice. While the ranges presented reflect observed market behavior, actual EOR pricing may vary based on factors that sit outside the scope of a standardized index.
EOR fees can differ materially based on role seniority, compensation structure, industry-specific requirements, benefit customization, and termination risk. Higher-paid or highly regulated roles may fall above the ranges shown, while volume-based agreements or limited-scope engagements may fall below them. These scenarios are not treated as representative and are therefore not used to define pricing bands.
Pricing also varies by vendor operating model. Some providers absorb compliance risk centrally, while others rely more heavily on local partners. These structural differences can affect how fees are packaged or presented without necessarily changing the underlying employment cost. The index does not attempt to normalize for internal vendor cost structures.
Currency dynamics and local payment constraints can influence effective pricing, particularly in markets with capital controls or volatile exchange rates. While ranges are normalized to USD equivalents for comparability, local billing arrangements may introduce short-term variability that is not reflected here.
Finally, this index does not account for future regulatory changes, enforcement shifts, or market disruptions that may alter EOR pricing dynamics after publication. While the update cadence is designed to capture sustained changes, short-term fluctuations or one-off regulatory events may not be immediately reflected.
Readers should use this index as a benchmarking and planning tool, and validate all final pricing assumptions against country-specific requirements and current provider proposals.
How to Use This Index
Applying pricing ranges responsibly for planning, comparison, and decision support
This index is designed to support early-stage planning and directional comparison, not to replace provider quotes or country-specific legal review. Readers should use the ranges and bands to frame expectations, identify relative cost differences between markets, and pressure-test internal assumptions about global hiring.
For budgeting and forecasting, the index is best used to establish order-of-magnitude estimates. High, medium, and low price bands indicate relative EOR fee exposure across countries, allowing finance and HR teams to model scenarios before engaging vendors. The ranges help identify where EOR costs are likely to be a primary constraint versus a secondary consideration relative to salary and statutory employment costs.
For market selection and expansion planning, the index helps compare countries on a like-for-like basis. Because all ranges reflect EOR service fees only, differences between countries should be interpreted as differences in compliance burden, employment risk, and delivery cost, rather than differences in compensation levels or total employer cost. Countries that sit near band boundaries should be treated with additional caution, as pricing outcomes in those markets are more sensitive to role scope and engagement structure.
For vendor evaluation, the index can be used as a reference point rather than a benchmark for negotiation. Pricing that consistently falls far outside the indicated range may warrant closer examination of scope, inclusions, or risk assumptions. Conversely, pricing that appears unusually low should be evaluated carefully to confirm that statutory compliance, termination handling, and ongoing administration are fully covered.
For cross-country comparison, readers should avoid treating ranges as directly interchangeable across regions. A similar EOR fee in two countries does not imply similar employment risk, enforcement intensity, or administrative effort. The country-level context provided elsewhere in the index should always be read alongside the numeric ranges.
Most importantly, this index should be used as a decision-support layer, not a decision trigger. Final hiring decisions should be based on current country regulations, role-specific requirements, and validated provider proposals. When used in this way, the index provides clarity without overconfidence and structure without false precision.
Update Cadence
This index is reviewed on a bi-annual basis to reflect sustained changes in global EOR pricing dynamics. Interim updates may be made when material regulatory changes, structural shifts in statutory benefits, or consistent market-wide pricing movements materially affect one or more countries or regions.
How to Cite This Index
The Global Employer of Record Pricing Index provides a directional view of how EOR service fees vary across countries and regions, using observed market ranges rather than list prices, based on current market conditions. The index groups countries by typical exposure to EOR pricing bands and is intended for early-stage budgeting and cross-market comparison, not as a source of price quotes or vendor rankings.
- Last Updated: January 19, 2026