10 Best Remote.com Alternatives & Competitors 2025
Remote.com is a popular choice for global hiring and EOR services, but it’s not the only option out there. Whether you’re looking for lower pricing, broader HR functionality, or more hands-on support, several strong alternatives can better match your needs. In this guide, we break down the best Remote alternatives to help you find the right fit for your global team.
EmployerRecords offers comprehensive, data focused and unbiased solutions. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links
Top Remote.com Alternatives
Here's a list of some of the top alternatives to Remote.com that you may use for your project. We have included top features, pricing details, pros and cons of each product to help you select the right solution for your business.
Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) is an Employer of Record (EOR) platform that helps businesses hire, pay, and support international employees without needing to open a local branch or legal entity. It’s built for companies that want to grow across borders but don’t want the hassle of navigating country-specific labor laws, tax systems, and payroll processes....
Can be more costly than setting up your own entity long-term
Limited customization in some local employment terms
Not ideal for companies wanting full local presence
Some delays in certain country-specific processes
Remote Vs Pebl
Pebl (Velocity Global) leans toward enterprise clients that need high-touch compliance support and flexible solutions, including contractor management and immigration. Remote is more product-led and self-service, making it easier for smaller companies to manage on their own.
Remofirst is a global Employer of Record (EOR) service that helps companies hire and manage employees in over 180 countries without the need to set up a local entity. It’s basically like having a trusted partner who handles all the heavy lifting, payroll, benefits, taxes, compliance, and HR paperwork, so you can focus on running...
Centralized platform to manage payroll and benefits
Cost-effective compared to setting up entities
Dedicated account manager support
Transparent pricing with no hidden fees
Cons
Limited control over local HR processes
Some countries may have slower onboarding timelines
Remote Vs Remofirst
Remofirst’s big differentiator is cost: its pricing is often much lower than Remote, a trade-off for less scale or fewer premium features. If your focus is hiring globally on a budget, Remofirst gives a leaner alternative; Remote may provide more robustness for compliance and large teams.
Deel is a global HR and payroll platform that helps companies hire employees and contractors in over 150 countries without the need to set up a local entity. Acting as an Employer of Record (EOR), Deel takes on the legal responsibility of employing workers on a company’s behalf, managing everything from contracts to compliance. It’s...
Deel tends to offer more integrations and HR workflow features than Remote, but Remote often edges ahead on compliance depth in niche countries. If you need heavier automation and ecosystem connectivity, Deel may serve you better; if in-country legal consistency is your priority, Remote can be stronger.
Hiring across borders used to be messy, with contracts, taxes, payroll, and compliance headaches, but that’s where Multiplier steps in. It’s an Employer of Record (EOR) platform that helps companies hire full-time employees in over 150 countries, without having to set up a legal entity in each location. Everything from onboarding to paying salaries, handling...
Limited customization in some country-specific benefits
Not ideal for short-term or project-based hiring
Support response times can vary depending on region
Remote Vs Multiplier
Multiplier offers simpler, more transparent pricing and tends to attract small to mid-sized teams who don’t need all the bells and whistles. Remote is more enterprise-ready with deeper infrastructure, but if you want predictability and no surprise fees, Multiplier is a compelling contrast.
Rippling’s EOR, or Employer of Record, is basically the solution you turn to when you want to hire people in other countries without setting up a legal entity there. It takes the mess and confusion out of global hiring. You don’t have to worry about figuring out local labor laws, payroll rules, or tax filings....
Rippling blends HR, IT, payroll, and EOR into a unified system—something Remote doesn’t do as comprehensively. If you want one dashboard to manage devices, apps, and employees globally, Rippling might be more attractive; Remote still wins on pure global EOR infrastructure and compliance.
Globalization Partners is a platform that helps companies hire people in other countries without having to set up a local business entity. It works as an Employer of Record (EOR), which means it legally employs workers on behalf of a company, handling everything from payroll and benefits to local compliance and taxes. This makes it...
Not ideal for companies wanting direct entity presence
Some features may vary by country
Remote Vs Globalization Partners
G-P, one of the earliest large EOR providers, has wide global reach and combines technology with managed-service support. Remote is typically more transparent on flat pricing and offers a cleaner self-serve interface. Companies that want concierge-style help may prefer G-P, while those looking for a software-first platform often pick Remote.
Teamed is a global employment platform that helps companies hire people from different countries without needing to set up local entities or worry about legal complications. It acts as an Employer of Record (EOR), taking care of the legal responsibilities involved in hiring talent internationally. This means businesses can easily expand their teams across borders...
May not suit companies needing deep local presence
Costs can add up for multiple hires
Customization options might be limited in some countries
Remote Vs Teamed
Remote.com is a tech-driven, self-serve EOR platform ideal for companies hiring at scale in 150+ countries with transparent pricing and strong in-house compliance. Teamed suits startups and small teams looking for a more personalized, boutique EOR service with hands-on support.
Detailed Feature Comparison Table
Feature
Remote.com
Teamed
Global EOR Coverage
150+ countries
150+ countries
HR & Payroll Suite
EOR, contractor management
EOR, contractor support
Contractor Payments
Yes
Yes
Onboarding Speed
Fast, platform-first onboarding
Fast, with personalized support
Compliance Support
In-house legal and compliance team
Regional experts, high-touch guidance
Benefits Administration
Country-specific
Tailored, with support from advisors
Platform Usability
Self-serve, tech-driven
Simpler UI, service-led experience
Integrations
Limited
Limited
Pricing Transparency
Transparent flat-rate pricing
Transparent, slightly variable by region
Ideal Customer Type
Scale-ups needing automation
Startups wanting hands-on global hiring
Key Takeaway
Choose Remote.com if you need a scalable, product-led EOR solution with global coverage and transparent pricing. Choose Teamed if your priority is high-touch support and a guided experience tailored to early-stage or lean teams expanding globally.
Hiring across borders sounds exciting, but the paperwork and compliance risks can quickly turn it into a mess. That’s where Oyster steps in. Oyster is a global Employer of Record (EOR) platform that helps companies hire full-time employees in over 180 countries, without needing to set up legal entities in each one. It handles the...
Requires trust in third-party handling legal employment
Remote Vs Oyster HR
Oyster markets itself for speed, simplicity, and remote-native design, which can outpace Remote in ease for smaller teams. But Remote tends to offer more depth in compliance and support in complicated jurisdictions. If you prioritize speed and developer-friendly UX, Oyster is appealing; for legal certainty in challenging markets, Remote holds up better.
Hiring someone from another country can get complicated fast, different laws, tax systems, and a mountain of paperwork. That’s where Papaya Global helps. It’s an Employer of Record (EOR) solution that takes the pressure off businesses trying to build global teams. Instead of setting up local branches or figuring out every country’s labor rules, companies...
Centralized platform for payroll and workforce management
Ensures legal compliance and local tax handling
Offers localized benefits and contract support
Real-time data tracking and reporting
Strong data security and privacy features
Cons
May be complex for very small teams
Support response time can vary
Limited control over local employment nuances
Integration options may require technical setup
Remote Vs Papaya Global
Papaya Global is stronger at managing global payroll and payments across many existing entities, while Remote is better optimized for hiring through EOR in greenfield markets. If you already have operations in multiple countries and want payroll consolidation, Papaya might be better; if you’re building out new hires globally, Remote has the edge.
Safeguard Global is an Employer of Record (EOR) solution designed for companies that want to hire international talent without setting up legal entities in each country. It helps businesses grow globally without getting tangled in local laws, payroll challenges, or compliance issues. Whether a company needs to onboard one remote employee or build a team...
Relies on third-party infrastructure in some regions
Remote Vs Safeguard Global
Remote.com is a modern, product-first EOR platform ideal for startups and scale-ups seeking transparent pricing, fast onboarding, and global coverage (150+ countries). Safeguard Global suits larger enterprises requiring deep local expertise, high-touch support, and a full-service global HR and payroll solution across even broader geographies.
Detailed Feature Comparison Table
Feature
Remote.com
Safeguard Global
Global EOR Coverage
150+ countries
180+ countries
HR & Payroll Suite
EOR, contractor management
EOR, global payroll, HR, benefits, entity setup
Contractor Payments
Yes – global support
Yes – integrated via platform partners
Onboarding Speed
Fast, self-serve
Fast, with guided workflows
Compliance Support
In-house legal & compliance teams
Local experts in-country + platform checks
Benefits Administration
Country-specific
Localized benefits, performance tools
Platform Usability
Clean, scalable UI
Enterprise-grade platform with analytics
Integrations
Limited
Broad (HRIS, ERP, finance systems)
Pricing Transparency
Flat-rate, transparent EOR pricing
Custom, usage-based, includes analytics
Support Model
Self-serve, with support tiers
High-touch, 400+ in-country experts
Ideal Customer Type
Tech-first teams, global scale-ups
Enterprises needing end-to-end global workforce management
Key Takeaway
Choose Remote.com for a lean, transparent, and fast-to-deploy global hiring solution with strong in-house compliance, especially suited for tech-forward companies scaling internationally. Choose Safeguard Global if you’re an enterprise seeking comprehensive, consultative support, full payroll and entity services, and deep local HR infrastructure.
Remote.com Alternatives FAQ
Q1. Who are the main competitors to Remote.com?
The most common Remote.com competitors include Deel, Rippling, Remofirst, Oyster HR, Multiplier, Velocity Global, and Globalization Partners, along with several regional EOR providers.
Q2. Is there a cheaper alternative to Remote.com?
Yes. Platforms such as Remofirst promote entry-level pricing around $199–$299 per employee per month, but final costs vary by country and benefits.
Q3. Which Remote.com alternative is best for startups?
Startups often choose Remofirst or Multiplier for budget-friendly plans, or Oyster HR for quick onboarding and simple contracts.
Q4. Can I move existing Remote-hired employees to another EOR?
Yes, but the transition requires signing new local employment contracts and meeting compliance requirements in each country, so the timeline differs by region.
Q5. Which alternative offers faster onboarding than Remote.com?
Oyster HR, and a few regional EORs advertise onboarding in as little as two to five days for straightforward hires, though actual timing depends on the country’s regulations and required documentation.
Recently Added Alternative Posts
Deel
Looking for a Deel alternative to manage your global hiring...
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.